Pending ROC filings are among the most common issues we are asked to look at, and among the most misunderstood. The usual assumption is that a backlog is a fixed problem that can be addressed whenever convenient. It is not fixed. Additional fees on delayed filings generally accrue with the period of delay, which means the cost of the problem grows while nothing is being done about it.
Warning signs worth taking seriously
- You are not certain which financial years have actually been filed
- A director has received a communication about DIR-3 KYC
- A notice has arrived from the MCA or the Registrar
- Your company details on the MCA portal no longer match reality
- A director resigned or was appointed and you are unsure whether it was filed
- The registered office moved and no form was submitted
- The company has been dormant and filings were assumed to be unnecessary
What a compliance review involves
A review establishes the factual position before any work is proposed. It compares the public MCA record against the company as it actually stands, and produces a clear answer to three questions: what has been filed, what is outstanding, and what it will take to regularise.
- Filing history
- Which annual returns and financial statements have been filed, and for which years.
- Director status
- DIN status for each director, including whether KYC is current.
- Master data accuracy
- Whether registered office, directors and capital on the record match the company as it exists.
- Event-based gaps
- Changes that occurred but were never reported to the Registrar.
- Cost of regularisation
- What the backlog will cost to clear, so the decision can be made on numbers.
Why the timing argument is straightforward
Most compliance decisions involve genuine trade-offs. This one does not. If filings are outstanding, the additional fee position generally worsens with time, and there is no scenario in which waiting produces a better outcome than acting.
The secondary argument is timing of a different kind. Compliance gaps are most damaging when discovered by someone else — a lender during credit assessment, an investor during diligence, or a buyer during a transaction. Finding them yourself, on your own timetable, is considerably less expensive than having them found for you.
If you are unsure where you stand
We offer a review of your company against the public MCA record at no cost. It establishes what has been filed, what is outstanding and what regularising would involve. If nothing is outstanding, that is a perfectly acceptable outcome and we will tell you so.
Continue reading
- ROC ComplianceThe ROC compliance checklist for a Private Limited CompanyEvery Private Limited Company registered in India carries statutory obligations under the Companies Act, 2013. Here is what falls due each year, and where companies most often slip.7 min read
- IEPF ClaimsWhat is an IEPF claim? A guide to recovering shares and dividendsWhen dividends go unclaimed for seven consecutive years, the shares behind them are transferred to the IEPF. That is a transfer, not a forfeiture — and it can be claimed back.8 min read